Part One
I began my quest for the answer to:
Does God Approve of ART and ARTISTS?
Where are the Christian ARTIST’S Role Models in Scripture?
with the beginning: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. (Genesis 1:1 KJV) This, the initial scripture from the first book of the Pentateuch, states that God was the creator, and that He used His spoken word, His voice, to create the universe. In Genesis, Chapters 1 through 3, all that God created and the methods and processes that He used are listed.
In addition to the spoken word, He:
- made
- named
- set them
- created
- blessed and sanctified
- ended His work and rested
- was visual (God saw)
- formed man of the dust of the ground
- breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul
- planted a garden and put man into itmade every tree grow out of the ground, and a river went out of Eden to water the garden.
From this account beginning in Genesis I:I (KJV), it is clear that all of the elements of our universe were created by God.
He is the creator and His methods were creative. God is the original creative visual artist who created creatively using two primary methods, the spoken word and His hands, and creation is His ART.
God used His hands to create us and more. He made the firmament (Gen.1:7); God set them (Gen. 1:17); God formed man (Gen. 2:7); God formed beast, fowl (Gen. 2:19); Took Adam’s rib and made woman (Gen. 2:21, 22); The Lord made coats of skins and clothed Adam and Eve (Gen. 3:21).
As an artist, I understand that the term, made, means to create; that formed means to sculpt with ones hands, and that to set or plant means to place an object in a location. God used these various methods, methods that we consider artistic, in His creation.
God created the heaven and the earth by speaking them into existence. God said, Let there be light and there was light. As God created the heaven and the earth, it follows that He created all of the materials that are typically used in making art such as pigment, binder, fiber, wood, stone, clay, etc. God created every element we use in art as well, including line, color, texture, pattern, contrast, shape, volume, light and shadow, depth, substance, beauty, and variety.
In creating everything, God created the five senses through which we perceive beauty, i.e., sound, taste, touch, smell, and sight. Sight is essential to the experiencing of the visual arts, and depth perception is crucial to the enjoyment of 3-dimensional artwork, including sculpture and architecture.
God the Creator. He created the world and everything in it. The arts as we understand them today were created by Him. We, as artists, simply reconfigure the elements that God created, using those elements for our own artistic expression. We create because He created us in His image–in the image of Himself, THE CREATOR.
We view God’s original creation as realistic, as standard representation. We accept the natural world, i.e., the colors in nature, the green grass, the blue sky, the green herb (Gen. 1:30 KJV) as being realistic. Everything that God created, we view as realism. God is a representational artist.
Why, then, with God as our example of creative artistry, was I finding visual art so often absent from the church? God created everything we need to be creative and to make art. Where were the artists and where was their art?
The churches could, should, be filled with visual examples of His Spirit’s presence to the glory of God. The possibilities are endless for the creativity of God’s people to fill His Sanctuary, His church. Every possible material is available, gold, silver, marble, wood for carving, paint, canvas, photographic equipment, clay, fiber… every conceivable material could be employed. The simple, unadorned cross need not be, typically, the only visual artistic reference in protestant churches, standing as a lone visual reference to the life and ministry of God.
I am certainly not suggesting that the walls be hung with the reproductions of paintings depicting religious themes, and photographs of sunrises and sunsets with scripture stretched across their width found in religious bookstores. To do so would be to minimize the potential of artistic expression. It would be a simplistic solution, and not even an adequate one.
Far better that the church declare that God, as the original creative visual artist who asks that we imitate Him, has in fact ordained that we express our creativity, that we make art. Such a declaration by the church would throw open the floodgates of creative expression, and the church would be filled to overflowing with beauty, artwork full of meaning, spiritually inspired.
The overflow would pour out from the church, the central hub, to the community. Public Art would have new, relevant meaning. Its effect would flow into individual homes where it would daily touch the lives and hearts of the family. Beauty and meaning, through art, would become a given. It would enhance and inspire the life of the individual, causing that person’s attention to be lifted to thoughts of God, to worship.
It is clear that one form of the arts is not more spiritual than the others. Although music is spiritually uplifting and widely accepted for use in worship within protestant churches, music is not more spiritual or more important than the visual arts, or poetry, or dance, or film. All of the arts could be utilized within the same framework as music has been traditionally.
An artwork needs no justification via an additional label attached that proclaims a scripture. An artwork can certainly stand alone, as the rainbow stands alone after the rain, as a reminder of God’s covenant with Noah to never again flood the earth. There is no scripture pasted to the rainbow, and its beauty is a reminder of the creativity of God, a visual reminder of His love for us.
True, the golden calf and the graven images are examples of the visual expression of creative people, and God was displeased with them. But His displeasure was not in the artistic ability of the people, nor was it in the resulting artwork. He was not angry because the golden calf lacked beauty. Graven images did not lack form, but it was the intended function of these artworks that caused God’s anger. The people were using these artworks as objects of their worship. They were worshipping these artworks as idols, and God’s displeasure was in the content of the artwork. God does not abhor artistic expression–to express oneself artistically is to imitate God. But God does abhor His people worshipping other gods, and that is the lesson to be learned in the examples of the golden calf and the graven images.
Over time, this message appears to have been lost, lost to the extent that those who may have become artists, whose work would have been utilized in the church bringing joy and inspiration to the congregation, has been lost as well. The hearts of the clergy must turn back to the heart of God where artistic gifts are concerned. Those who were given artistic gifts by God must be welcomed back to the congregation as artists whose expression, whose artwork, is important and necessary to the full functioning of the church. To have eliminated the visual arts from the church is to have cut off one arm of the congregation, and the church cannot function properly without that one arm. To be made whole, the church must reconcile itself with the arts, and the arts must occupy their rightful place in the church.